WEBVTT

NOTE
This file was generated by Descript <www.descript.com>

00:00:11.116 --> 00:00:12.706
Avdi: This is the cash flush.

00:00:12.976 --> 00:00:17.986
A programmer's audio scrapbook,
recorded May 8th, 2023.

00:00:19.516 --> 00:00:24.466
I'm Avdi Grimm, and today
I have a selection from the

00:00:24.466 --> 00:00:29.536
introduction to "Computer Power
and Human Reason: from Judgment to

00:00:29.536 --> 00:00:32.116
Calculation", by Joseph Weizenbaum.

00:00:40.684 --> 00:00:44.194
Most other programs could not vividly
demonstrate the information processing

00:00:44.194 --> 00:00:45.524
power of a computer to visitors.

00:00:46.189 --> 00:00:49.039
Who did not already have some
specialized knowledge, say of

00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:50.359
some branch of mathematics.

00:00:50.989 --> 00:00:54.709
DOCTOR, on the other hand, could be
appreciated on some level by anyone.

00:00:55.279 --> 00:00:58.369
Its power as a demonstration vehicle
was further enhanced by the fact

00:00:58.374 --> 00:01:00.829
that the visitor could actually
participate in its operation

00:01:01.519 --> 00:01:04.849
Soon copies of DOCTOR constructed on
the basis of my published description

00:01:04.849 --> 00:01:07.909
of it began appearing at other
institutions in the United States.

00:01:08.509 --> 00:01:11.029
The program became nationally
known, and even in certain

00:01:11.029 --> 00:01:12.439
circles, a national play thing.

00:01:13.459 --> 00:01:17.929
The shocks I experienced as DOCTOR
became widely known and played were due

00:01:17.929 --> 00:01:20.059
principally to three distinct events.

00:01:20.749 --> 00:01:25.129
One, a number of practicing
psychiatrists seriously believed

00:01:25.159 --> 00:01:28.459
the DOCTOR computer program could
grow into a nearly completely

00:01:28.459 --> 00:01:30.319
automatic form of psychotherapy.

00:01:30.829 --> 00:01:32.239
Colby et al write, for example:

00:01:33.814 --> 00:01:37.144
further work must be done before the
program will be ready for clinical use.

00:01:37.564 --> 00:01:41.164
If the method proves beneficial, then
it would provide a therapeutic tool

00:01:41.314 --> 00:01:44.914
which can be made widely available to
mental hospitals and psychiatric centers

00:01:45.094 --> 00:01:49.384
suffering a shortage of therapists because
of the time sharing capabilities of modern

00:01:49.384 --> 00:01:53.254
and future computers, several hundred
patients an hour could be handled by a

00:01:53.254 --> 00:01:55.024
computer system designed for this purpose.

00:01:55.534 --> 00:01:59.809
The human therapist involved in the design
and operation of this system, would not

00:01:59.809 --> 00:02:04.129
be replaced but would become a much more
efficient man since his efforts would

00:02:04.129 --> 00:02:08.779
no longer be limited to the one-to-one
patient therapist ratio as now exists.

00:02:10.759 --> 00:02:14.209
I had thought it essential as a
prerequisite to the very possibility

00:02:14.209 --> 00:02:18.049
that one person might help another learn
to cope with his emotional problems,

00:02:18.049 --> 00:02:21.619
that the helper himself participate
in the others' experience of those

00:02:21.619 --> 00:02:25.969
problems, and in large part by way
of his own empathetic recognition of

00:02:25.969 --> 00:02:28.279
them, himself come to understand them.

00:02:28.759 --> 00:02:32.569
There are undoubtedly many techniques to
facilitate the therapist's imaginative

00:02:32.569 --> 00:02:34.429
projection into the patient's inner life.

00:02:35.389 --> 00:02:39.859
But that it was possible for even one
practicing psychiatrist to advocate that

00:02:39.859 --> 00:02:44.419
this crucial component of the therapeutic
process be entirely supplanted by pure

00:02:44.419 --> 00:02:46.819
technique that I had not imagined.

00:02:47.359 --> 00:02:51.319
What must a psychiatrist who makes
such a suggestion think he is doing

00:02:51.319 --> 00:02:55.039
while treating a patient, that he
can view the simplest mechanical

00:02:55.039 --> 00:02:58.849
parody of a single interviewing
technique as having captured anything

00:02:58.849 --> 00:03:00.409
of the essence of a human encounter.

00:03:01.039 --> 00:03:04.129
Perhaps Colby et all give us the
required clue when they write:

00:03:04.714 --> 00:03:07.924
a human therapist can be viewed
as an information processor and

00:03:07.924 --> 00:03:11.884
decision maker with a set of decision
rules, which are closely linked to

00:03:11.884 --> 00:03:13.774
short range and long range goals.

00:03:14.044 --> 00:03:17.164
He is guided in these decisions
by rough empiric rules.

00:03:17.284 --> 00:03:21.214
Telling him what is appropriate to say
and not to say in certain contexts.

00:03:21.454 --> 00:03:24.754
To incorporate these processes to
the degree possessed by a human

00:03:24.754 --> 00:03:28.744
therapist in the program would be a
considerable undertaking, but we are

00:03:28.744 --> 00:03:30.304
attempting to move in this direction.

00:03:32.059 --> 00:03:36.799
What can the psychiatrist's image of
his patient be when he sees himself, as

00:03:36.799 --> 00:03:42.559
therapist, not as an engaged human being,
acting as a healer, but as an information

00:03:42.559 --> 00:03:44.719
processor following rules, et cetera?

00:03:46.099 --> 00:03:50.059
Such questions were my awakening to
what Polanyi had earlier called a

00:03:50.209 --> 00:03:54.979
scientific outlook that appeared to have
produced a mechanical conception of man

00:03:56.419 --> 00:04:01.099
two: I was startled to see how quickly
and how very deeply people conversing

00:04:01.099 --> 00:04:04.339
with DOCTOR became emotionally
involved with the computer and how

00:04:04.339 --> 00:04:05.939
unequivocally they anthropomorphized it.

00:04:06.829 --> 00:04:09.709
Once my secretary, who had watched
me work on the program for many

00:04:09.709 --> 00:04:12.889
months and therefore surely knew
it to be merely a computer program,

00:04:13.039 --> 00:04:14.089
started conversing with it.

00:04:14.599 --> 00:04:17.629
After only a few interchanges with
it, she asked me to leave the room.

00:04:18.499 --> 00:04:19.159
Another time.

00:04:19.159 --> 00:04:23.569
I suggested I might rig the system so
that I could examine all conversations

00:04:23.569 --> 00:04:25.669
anyone had had with it, say overnight.

00:04:26.209 --> 00:04:30.649
I was promptly bombarded with accusations
that what I proposed amounted to spying

00:04:30.649 --> 00:04:34.519
on people's most intimate thoughts, clear
evidence that people were conversing

00:04:34.519 --> 00:04:37.969
with the computer as if it were a
person who could be appropriately and

00:04:37.969 --> 00:04:39.649
useful addressed in intimate terms.

00:04:40.204 --> 00:04:42.994
I knew of course, that people form
all sorts of emotional bonds to

00:04:42.994 --> 00:04:46.444
machines, for example, to musical
instruments, motorcycles, and cars.

00:04:46.624 --> 00:04:49.324
And I knew from long experience
that the strong emotional ties

00:04:49.324 --> 00:04:52.624
many programmers have to, their
computers are often formed after only

00:04:52.624 --> 00:04:54.184
short exposures to their machines.

00:04:54.634 --> 00:04:57.484
What I had not realized is that
extremely short exposures to a

00:04:57.484 --> 00:05:00.964
relatively simple computer program
could induce powerful, delusional

00:05:00.964 --> 00:05:02.254
thinking in quite normal people.

00:05:02.839 --> 00:05:05.869
This insight led me to attach
new importance to questions of

00:05:05.869 --> 00:05:08.999
the relationship between the
individual and the computer and

00:05:08.999 --> 00:05:10.519
hence to resolve to think about them

00:05:12.259 --> 00:05:12.709
Three.

00:05:13.579 --> 00:05:16.879
Another widespread and to me,
surprising reaction to the ELIZA

00:05:16.879 --> 00:05:20.239
program was the spread of a belief,
that it demonstrated a general

00:05:20.599 --> 00:05:23.929
solution to the problem of computer
understanding of natural language.

00:05:24.859 --> 00:05:27.469
In my paper, I had tried to
say that no general solution

00:05:27.469 --> 00:05:28.759
to that problem was possible.

00:05:29.029 --> 00:05:33.019
I e that languages understood only
in contextual frameworks that even

00:05:33.024 --> 00:05:36.199
these can be shared by people to
only a limited extent,  and that

00:05:36.199 --> 00:05:40.339
consequently even people are not
embodiments of any such general solution.

00:05:40.999 --> 00:05:42.679
But these conclusions were often ignored.

00:05:43.099 --> 00:05:46.099
In any case, ELIZA was such
a small and simple step.

00:05:46.444 --> 00:05:49.744
Its contribution was, if any at
all, only to vividly underline what

00:05:49.744 --> 00:05:51.274
many others had long ago discovered.

00:05:51.334 --> 00:05:55.774
Namely, the importance of context to
language understanding . The subsequent,

00:05:55.774 --> 00:05:59.104
much more elegant and surely more
important work of winograd in computer

00:05:59.104 --> 00:06:02.914
comprehension of English is currently
being misinterpreted just as ELIZA was.

00:06:03.304 --> 00:06:07.014
The reaction to ELIZA showed me more
vividly than anything I had seen hitherto.

00:06:07.264 --> 00:06:11.794
The enormously exaggerated a
attribution, an even well educated

00:06:11.794 --> 00:06:13.414
audience is capable of making.

00:06:13.834 --> 00:06:17.674
Even strives to make to a
technology it does not understand.

00:06:18.274 --> 00:06:22.024
If as appeared to be the case, the
public's attribution are wildly

00:06:22.024 --> 00:06:26.364
misconceived, then public decisions are
bound to be misguided and often wrong.

00:06:26.904 --> 00:06:30.094
Difficult questions arise
out of these observations.

00:06:30.364 --> 00:06:33.784
What, for example, are the scientists
responsibilities with respect to

00:06:33.784 --> 00:06:38.434
making his work public, and to whom
or what is the scientist responsible?

00:06:45.476 --> 00:06:45.866
Again.

00:06:45.926 --> 00:06:50.756
That was a selection from the introduction
to "Computer Power and Human Reason,

00:06:51.086 --> 00:06:57.776
from Judgment to Calculation" by
Joseph Weizenbaum, published in 1976,

00:07:00.006 --> 00:07:01.596
that's what was in the cache today.

00:07:03.576 --> 00:07:07.696
If you enjoy this show it is
brought to you by Graceful Dev.

00:07:08.716 --> 00:07:14.116
That's Graceful Dev, a Garden of
Developer training where you can

00:07:14.116 --> 00:07:18.646
get two weeks free by using the code
CACHEFLUSH all caps, all in one word.

00:07:20.791 --> 00:07:23.431
Thanks again for listening
and don't forget to flush.

